<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Church Marketing Sucks</title>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/</link>
<description>Frustrate. Educate. Motivate.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:30:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.31</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Christians Are Crazy Protestors</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.philcooke.com/EA_protest" target="_blank">Phil Cooke</a> and <a href="http://www.thinkchristian.net/index.php/2009/06/30/mocking-christian-protests/" target="_blank">Think Christian</a> have recently covered a marketing stunt by Electronic Arts surrounding the release of a new game, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dante%27s_Inferno_(video_game)" target="_blank">Dante's Infrerno</a>. Here's a bit of <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hmKyub7zU5NelM_NYJ-JxSMkvBWAD98KF7880" target="_blank">what happened</a>:</p>

<blockquote>The game publisher hired a group of nearly 20 people to stand outside the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles on Wednesday and appear to protest the upcoming EA game "Dante's Inferno." EA spokeswoman Holly Rockwood says the stunt was arranged by a viral marketing agency hired by EA.</blockquote>

<p>This is a reckless, foolish stunt by Electronic Arts, and it makes them seem like very disingenuous [insert a derogatory name of choice]s. Stunts like this at the expense of others and that are so blatantly dishonest really irritate me.</p>

<p>But all that aside, as Christians, we set them up for this joke. I told the story of when Hooters came to the town of the church I attended <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/01/the_church_meet.html">here</a>, and I think this is in the same vein. We've made ourselves the butt of the joke by being protesters rather than servants. And now, it's a tough pill to swallow as we reap the fruits of that stance.</p>

<p>What is your church doing to distance itself from these sort of outlandish protests in favor of a more philanthropic, gospel-based views?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/christians_are.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/christians_are.html</guid>
<category>Evangelism &amp; Outreach</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:30:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scalejacking and Performance Metrics</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Goins recently posted at Wrecked for the Ordinary entitled <a href="http://community.wrecked.org/?filename=marketers-quit-hijacking-our-communities" target="_blank">Marketers, Quit Hijacking Our Communities</a>.</p>

<p>In it, he makes some great points regarding marketers' obsession with numbers and metrics. I'll give you a couple snippets to whet your appetite, but <a href="http://community.wrecked.org/?filename=marketers-quit-hijacking-our-communities" target="_blank">you don't want to miss the entire article</a>.</p>

<p>I'll quote Jeff who quotes Seth Godin who is quoting Dave Balter (welcome to the Internet.):</p>

<blockquote>"Because marketers were raised on the scale of mass-TV, radio, newspapers, they have a churn and burn mentality. The Internet turns this upside down. The Internet is about who, not how many. The Internet lets you take really good care of 100 people instead of harassing 2,000."</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/scalejacking_an.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/scalejacking_an.html</guid>
<category>Demographics/Research</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:03:08 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Power of a Testimony</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>by <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/bios/guestblogger.html#tobiassturesson">Tobias Sturesson</a>, Guest Blogger</p>

<p>"And they have overcome (conquered) him by means of the blood of the Lamb and by the utterance of their testimony..." (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=revelation%2012:11;&version=45;" target="_blank">Revelation 12:1, Amplified Bible</a>)</p>

<p>In the marketing world, there is a great understanding of the power of a testimony. It doesn't matter what you claim about your product, but it does matter that some of the people who have used your product share their experience.</p>

<p>I am involved in the marketing strategy group of a large Christian conference center in Sweden, and we encourage all of our guests to comment on their visit. Then, we ask for permission to use that in our printed material or on our web site, and it has proven to be incredibly effective for us.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/the_power_of_a.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/07/the_power_of_a.html</guid>
<category>The Christian Walk</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:21:36 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Denominational Campaign Poll Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/i_am_a_christia.html">Kevin covered the trend</a> of denominations running ad campaigns focusing on branding individuals as members of specific denominations. For example, "I am a Southern Baptist." Or, "We are Episcopalians." But what are your feelings about these campaigns?</p>

<p>Eek, only 4% of you are huge fans. That spells some bad news for denominations looking to build loyalty with possible new members.</p>

<p>A bigger chunk of you are all right with them, but they don't get you too excited. It's not going to make you head down to your local Kingdom Hall with your bicycle because a few folks in a magazine said they were Jehovah's Witnesses.</p>

<p>21% of you are right there with me--laughing your hind end off that these denominations are ripping one another off on a campaign based around individuality.</p>

<p>And, finally, 57% of you think denominational marketing campaigns suck. You think they ought to go back to the drawing board and not come back until they have something better. I feel like there could be potential for a niche site there.</p>

<p>This week, we want to know: How do you feel about the idea of <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/bring_your_gun.html">bringing guns to church</a>? Move your mouse over to our right sidebar to cast your vote.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/denominational_2.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/denominational_2.html</guid>
<category>Poll Results</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:53:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Church Marketing Lab: Bulletins, Web Sites and More</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>When the folks in the Church Marketing Lab haven't been <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/cfcc/discuss/72157619881499388/">getting together</a> or helping Michael get ready for <a href="http://www.howconference.com/tracks/" target="_blank">his presentation</a> at the <a href="http://www.howconference.com/GeneralMenu/" target="_blank">HOW Design Conference</a>, they've been working hard and getting feedback. Here's just a bit of what we've seen come through the Church Marketing Lab lately:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/84773642@N00/3659905297/" title="killrelationships_cover by yourpilcher, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3602/3659905297_a431de43d9_t.jpg" width="66" height="100" alt="killrelationships_cover" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/84773642@N00/3659905297/in/pool-79997956@N00">How to Kill Relationships and Irritate People</a> is an upcoming series about biblical relationships.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/church_marketin_136.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/church_marketin_136.html</guid>
<category>Peer Review</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:23:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>We Are Evangelists</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/religion/2009/06/03/churches-fight-back-against-shrinking-membership.html" target="_blank"><em>U.S. World News & Report</em></a> article we <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/you_cant_advert.html">already covered</a> included a quote I'd glossed over. It comes from the director of communications for the Episcopal Church, Anne Rudig, and is a sentiment I'd guess a lot of us share:</p>

<blockquote>"I'm an evangelist, too."</blockquote>

<p>It's a simple and powerful statement that <strong>church marketing is evangelism</strong>.</p>

<p>It reminds me of the first chapter of Meredith Gould's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0819222852/churchmarke03-20" target="_blank"><em>The Word Made Fresh: Communicating Church and Faith Today</em></a>, which argues that <strong>church communication is ministry</strong>.</p>

<p>What we do is not just some business skill for the church. The work you do is not mere work. It is a vital ministry of the church, seeking and saving the lost. We marketers and communicators, designers and editors, volunteers and assistants--we are evangelists.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/we_are_evangeli.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/we_are_evangeli.html</guid>
<category>Philosophy</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hands-On Advice From Servolution</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0310287634/churchmarke03-20" target="_blank"><img alt="2009_06_24_servolution.jpg" src="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/graphics/2009_06_24_servolution.jpg" width="125" height="190" align="right"/></a>by <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/bios/guestblogger.html#philprior">Phil Prior</a>, Guest Blogger</p>

<p>Having <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/servolution_sta.html">reviewed</a> Dino Rizzo’s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0310287634/churchmarke03-20" target="_blank"><em>Servolution</em></a>, it’s clear that there are a number of lessons for church marketers that can be drawn from it’s pages. I just want to highlight four specifics.  </p>

<p><strong>1. Who would miss your church?</strong></p>

<blockquote>“A questions I am always asking myself is, If HPC closed down tomorrow, who would notice?”</blockquote>

<p>While advertising, street signs and a full garage on a Sunday are great signs of success for a church, they aren’t necessarily indications of a great impact on your community. As Rizzo points out, a billboard may mean that your community knows the name of your church, but does it mean any more than that? </p>

<p>The ultimate test would be this: if your church closed, would anyone notice? Other than the regulars, who would shed a tear for a moment and then go somewhere else? Would the neighbors, local police, community leaders and schools even notice if you disappeared? Now think, what would change that--another advertisement or visiting the sick and staffing an after school club?  That’s the point of <em>Servolution</em>, to be more than a building in a community but a church that exists in the whole of the community.  </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/handson_advice.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/handson_advice.html</guid>
<category>Reviews</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:53:43 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Servolution: Starting a Church Revolution Through Serving</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0310287634/churchmarke03-20" target="_blank"><img alt="2009_06_24_servolution.jpg" src="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/graphics/2009_06_24_servolution.jpg" width="125" height="190" align="right"/></a>by <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/bios/guestblogger.html#philprior">Phil Prior</a>, Guest Blogger</p>

<p>Dino Rizzo’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0310287634/churchmarke03-20" target="_blank"><em>Servolution</em></a> does two things:</p>

<p>First, it tells the story of <a href="http://www.healingplacechurch.org/" target="_blank">Healing Place Church</a> (HPC) in Louisiana, and how in 1993, armed with a $400 check, Rizzo and his wife DeLynn started to serve the unwanted people of Baton Rouge. In the book he chronicles the worries and successes, the challenges and the celebrations in the life of a church community that grew from the vision of one couple to having multiple campuses and a range of ministries. </p>

<p>Secondly, Rizzo shares the strategies and resources that have made the ministry of HPC so fruitful. The book concludes with suggestions of things you could do to get your own ‘servolution’ started and a list of connections that HPC have made during the course of serving such a wide range of people.  </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/servolution_sta.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/servolution_sta.html</guid>
<category>Reviews</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:40:31 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Megachurches Are Hip, Young and Selfish</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's not marketing news per se, but the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090609/ap_on_re/us_rel_megachurch_survey;_ylt=AqpiFLUZx8xUSbuQpN_sNKM7Xs8F;_ylu=X3oDMTJ1YXU5djA5BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwNjA5L3VzX3JlbF9tZWdhY2h1cmNoX3N1cnZleQRwb3MDMQRzZWMDeW5fcGFnaW5hdGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawNzdHVkeW1lZ2FjaHU-" target="_blank">Associated Press reported</a> last week on a study looking at the differences in contemporary megachurches and their smaller Protestant counterparts (minichurches?). Anyone interested in churches and marketing will likely be eager to dive into the statistics behind the article. The overarching finding of the study is that megachurches tend to be composed of younger, single adults, while other churches tend to be home for older families.</p>

<p>Among the other interesting findings of the study are that only three in four described the megachurch they attend as their "home church." This could be indicative of some level of Christian tourism, where people visit to see what a given church is like, or it could just be that people are shifting towards visiting more than one church regularly. Megachurches are also the place of worship for more well-educated and wealthy individuals.</p>

<p>The survey seems to present some overwhelming evidence in favor of megachurches, except for one key aspect:</p>

<blockquote>Nearly 45 percent of megachurch attenders never volunteer at the church and 32 percent give little or no money to the congregation.</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/megachurches_ar_1.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/megachurches_ar_1.html</guid>
<category>Demographics/Research</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cussing Pastors Poll Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="2009_06_23_cussingpastorspollresults.jpg" src="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/graphics/2009_06_23_cussingpastorspollresults.jpg" width="190" height="303" align="right"/>Ed Young's <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/ed_young_the_cu.html">rant about cussing pastors</a> got you guys all fired up. So we figured it was only appropriate to try and get our finger on the pulse of the Church Marketing Sucks community, via a poll.</p>

<p>It looks like the biggest group of you are tired of hearing about all of this stuff. Over a third of you think we ought to be worrying about more important things rather than the diction of authority figures.</p>

<p>Slightly less of you, 29%, think a pastor ought to keep it clean. "Cussing" should never be a word to describe pastors. And another 27% of you think that it should stay as clean as possible, but the occasional, decorative curse isn't so bad.</p>

<p>So who does that leave in the minority? Those of you who love some four-letter words and expect the same from your pastor. You think pastors should be able to use whatever word is best in the situation, regardless of whether children's ears need to be covered.</p>

<p>This week, we'll revisit another post:  <strong>What do you think of "I Am/We Are [Insert Denomination Here]" <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/i_am_a_christia.html">ad campaigns</a>?</strong></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/cussing_pastors.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/cussing_pastors.html</guid>
<category>Poll Results</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Quotes on Church Marketing</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/faith/47963531.html" target="_blank"><em>Star Tribune</em></a> recently offered a take on religious marketing, exploring whether or not religious groups are going overboard. The article has a token quote talking about consumerism and the "slippery slope of theological compromise," but the bulk of the article is money quotes in support of marketing. There's even a shout out to yours truly (though the bulk of our work is described as offering "tips on designing eye-catching web pages"). </p>

<p>But let's get to those money quotes from folks smarter than us:</p>

<blockquote>"People see it as too worldly or gimmicky for the church to be marketing itself. But most of the same people who say it is sacrilegious also expect their church to have a website, a listing in the phone book or an ad in the phone book. To me, this is marketing." -John Mayer, executive director of City Vision, an organization that tracks religious demographics.

<p>"They used to look at me as if I'd just said a four-letter word." -Hayim Herring, former rabbi and now executive director of STAR (Synagogues: Transformation and Renewal), on the response he used to get to suggesting synagogues use new technologies.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/quotes_on_churc.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/quotes_on_churc.html</guid>
<category>Philosophy</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:44:30 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Build Awareness or Meet the Need</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="2009_06_12_Megaphone.jpg" src="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/graphics/2009_06_12_Megaphone.jpg" width="150" height="114" align="right" />I got a call last week from a husband and wife team who are launching a new business going after people who own RVs/trailers. With boomer mobility on the rise, it's a growing market with tons of potential. The particular product they're selling will be a huge hit. Unfortunately, the market doesn't understand what the product is or what problem it solves. Yet.</p>

<p>This is a classic awareness problem. Great product or service. Huge market potential. Major disconnect between the two. So we try and do both. We attempt to build awareness for the product/service and sell it at the same time. Doesn't work. You've got to pick one.</p>

<p>Churches experience this all the time. New church gets started with many new ways of "doing" church. The community is ripe for new ways of doing church. Major disconnect between the "new church" and those that are looking for new ways to do church because they're having a difficult time finding each other.</p>

<p>Like my friends with the new product, they need to raise awareness for the itch they're scratching. You can't tell people they have an itch and scratch it for them at the same time. When you attempt to do both, your credibility and/or ability to do either is stifled.</p>

<p>So build awareness.<br />
Or meet the need(s) of the aware.<br />
You choose.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/build_awareness.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/build_awareness.html</guid>
<category>Brand &amp; Identity</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:54:25 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Church You Can Call Home</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This idea has been tossed around from time-to-time, just here on Church Marketing Sucks, so I'm sure it's made the rounds outside of our little world. But churches doing good and being creative is always worth reporting.</p>

<p>Long, long ago we ran a satirical piece about <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2007/07/turning_churche.html">megachurches serving as homeless shelters</a>. Then, we discussed some just ideas in a four-part series, and one part focused on the idea of <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2008/04/just_ideas_be_a.html">churches providing a home for the homeless</a>.</p>

<p>Some churches <a href="http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2009/jun/14/program-helps-homeless-get-back-their-feet/" target="_blank">made the news</a> recently participating in the Family Promise program, which looks to provide not just homes, but complete rehabilitation for those experiencing homelessness. The article's final line, a quote from a program participant, sent chills of happiness down my spine:</p>

<blockquote>"I've never met so many people who give."</blockquote>

<p>This is what people should be saying about the church. You can learn more about Family Promise, including how to participate, <a href="http://www.familypromise.org/" target="_blank">at their web site</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/a_church_you_ca.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/a_church_you_ca.html</guid>
<category>Social Justice</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:27:13 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Marketing Myths</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently, <a href="http://kemmeyer.typepad.com/less_clutter_noise/2009/06/7-myths-marketers-their-bosses-gotta-stop-buying.html" target="_blank">Kem Meyer</a> mentioned an article from Chief Marketer entitled <a href="http://chiefmarketer.com/technology/0608-7-cmo-myths-marketing/" target="_blank">7 Marketing Myths CMOs (and Their Bosses) Gotta Stop Buying</a>.</p>

<p>I think myth numbers five and six hit the closest to home for churches:</p>

<p>Myth #5 - "I don't care what it takes, just get it done!" <br />
Myth #6 - "We can't spare a dime to invest in research."</p>

<p>All too often, we get so connected with an idea (a song, a service type, <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/05/church_copycats.html">a TV show</a>, etc.) that we'll stop at nothing to make it a reality. I think the church loses a lot of resources this way, and it's a fine line we have to walk.</p>

<p>And how many times have churches overlooked the value of research? Polls, surveys and research take a back-seat because of their up-front cost, in spite of their long-term benefits.</p>

<p>Make sure to read the <a href="http://chiefmarketer.com/technology/0608-7-cmo-myths-marketing/" target="_blank">full article</a> for even more myths.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/marketing_myths.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/marketing_myths.html</guid>
<category>Philosophy</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:46 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Church Marketing Sucks Books Poll Results</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="2009_06_16_cmsbookspollresults.jpg" src="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/graphics/2009_06_16_cmsbookspollresults.jpg" width="190" height="317" align="right"/>A couple of months ago, we asked for some help from book reviewers, and we got a great response. As a result, we've been able to kick up our book reviews recently. And we have more coming down the pipeline for you as well. With that in mind, we wanted to ask which recently-reviewed book your staff most needs to read.</p>

<p>Coming out on top (by a wide margin) was Kem Meyer's <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/less_clutter_le.html"><em>Less Clutter, Less Noise</em></a>. Your church is having a bit of trouble focusing on what matters, opting for the catch-all approach. You want them to know they need to <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/pick_one.html">pick one</a>.</p>

<p>Next up was <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/05/tribes_we_need.html"><em>Tribes</em></a>. Some of you have probably read this book already, and some of you probably just know the name of Seth Godin. Either way, you're ready for your leaders to start taking risks and leading boldly.</p>

<p>In a close third was <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/01/book_reviewwill.html"><em>Reimagining Church</em></a>. It sounds like some of your churches have added so much clutter that they're losing focus on what the church is meant to be and do. And you'd like them to make a drastic shift.</p>

<p>Only 5% of you would prescribe <a href="http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/04/flickering_pixe.html"><em>Flickering Pixels</em></a> to your church staff. I guess it's not an epidemic that pastors are getting over their head in technology and losing their focus on the message of Jesus Christ.</p>

<p>This week, in what's sure to be a controversial poll, we're asking: Where do you stand on cussing pastors? Navigate on over to the right sidebar to let us know how you feel.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/church_marketin_135.html</link>
<guid>http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/archives/2009/06/church_marketin_135.html</guid>
<category>Poll Results</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>