« Shopping for God: Great Awakenings? | Main | Extra! Extra! Poll Results »
January 21, 2008
Jesus Billboard is an Eyesore
(Filed under: First Impressions & Beyond)
This is fun: A Minnesota newspaper does a story about the city cracking down on "eyesores" and the accompanying front-page photo features a billboard for a local church with "Jesus" in giant letters. The photo was meant to show the various billboards crowding Highway 22 (and it does--you can see six separate billboards in the photo), but more than a few folks took offense to Jesus being described as an eyesore.
So class, a few questions for discussion:
- Is this billboard an eyesore?
- Are billboards generally eyesores?
- Can a billboard be redeemed by Jesus? (Does putting Jesus on an ugly billboard make it less ugly?)
- How come no one complained about the cropping of the photo which rendered the url as: "www.jesusass"?
- Could your church's billboards (or bulletins or web sites or whatever) be labeled as eyesores (whether the medium or the design earns the label)?
- How would your church respond? (Not sure if Jesus Assembly of God has or will responded, but at least their billboard matches their web site and apparently their building.)
- How come none of these letters to the editor (save one) address church marketing issues? And what is all their complaining accomplishing? Is that the message of Christ--that we're easily offended? (As one blogger put it, "Let's get it straight: Defending the honor of a billboard that says 'Jesus' in eight-foot-high letters is more important than, well, gosh, just about anything else." Ouch.)
More than a few angles here, from a specific church doing marketing to how the Christian community responds. Break into groups and discuss. (link via Eyeteeth)
Posted by Kevin D. Hendricks at January 21, 2008 3:12 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.churchmarketingsucks.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1363
Comments
I gotta say that I cannot stand billboards regardless if they are from a religious organization or not. However the media probably cropped the photo and used that specific on purpose just to get a reaction out of people....and look it worked.
The people who get offended about it just need to get over it. There are so many other things we can be worried about.
Posted by: Randy at January 21, 2008 5:22 PM
No one has said anything about how the editor cropped the photo for the web address to say something too.
Posted by: Josh Read at January 21, 2008 5:27 PM
"He has no stately form or majesty
That we should look upon Him,
Nor appearance that we should be attracted to Him." - Is 53:2b
Posted by: Nathan Youngman at January 21, 2008 6:08 PM
I suppose I should link to the paper's apology for those who think they did it intentionally as an anti-Christian message (please).
Posted by: Kevin D. Hendricks at January 21, 2008 6:28 PM
Although I don't think the paper did this maliciously, they had to realize what they were doing. Pertaining to church marketing, though, I think church billboards can be a good thing if they're designed properly. Putting 'Jesus' real big on a billboard doesn't really accomplish much as far as marketing goes.
Posted by: Nick Poole at January 21, 2008 6:49 PM
The problem with most billboards are that they ARE eye sores! They stick out and have no pleasant way of being shown.
This example just proves my point! Yuck! However is their graphic designer needs to be sacked..
Posted by: Jermayn Parker at January 21, 2008 9:10 PM
It seems to me that the church could figure out some way to respond to this picture in a positive way. Just complaining about how unfair it is, doesn't accomplish anything. Buy jesusass and direct people to your website, talk about other ways you reach out and try to attract people to your church. Tell about how you impact the community, something that doesn't make you sound whiny
Posted by: Jay at January 22, 2008 5:20 AM
i think billboards, in general, are eyesores.
but that particular one isn't an eyesore. it is pretty much the same marketing scheme as Sprint -- yellow background, solid black letters.
if that billboard is an eyesore, then so is any Sprint advertisement.
Posted by: johnny brower at January 22, 2008 6:16 AM
At least they are consistent.
A huge ugly yellow billboard, ugly yellow Jesus on the front of the church (if website is accurate), and they even have the billboard on their website.
It is like the obnoxious cars salesman on TV who always say the same thing over and over during all of their 4 million commercials.
I think that their motto for the church really deserves to be criticized. "A church for people who love Jesus." Way to reach out to the community. I do not even mean lost people... to me it insinuates that other churches do not love Jesus.
Posted by: matthew at January 22, 2008 6:19 AM
Just out of interest, does the building cropped out on the left hand side count as an eyesore as well? It looks faintly industrial.
Posted by: Phil at January 22, 2008 10:08 AM
i think us believers should creatively use what we can to communicate... 'creatively' is the key word. i think Jesus was like that but not everyone liked him, that's for sure. thanks. check out "Jesus was a Viral Marketer" at www.theproblemwithreligion.com if you've got time.
Posted by: jonathan foster at January 22, 2008 3:39 PM
I'm pretty sure that when Jesus said "...I am lifted up from the Earth," this is exactly what he had in mind!
Posted by: brad at January 22, 2008 3:53 PM
My question is Why not. It todays world we are hit with over 3,000 impressions per day! In the late 1950's there were only 400 impression per day. Historically, billboards are only good for two things. One, new business. Two Directions "Mcdonalds next exit". For me the question becomes, are we using are marketing dollars effectively and efficiently. I want to ask the person who place the buy, if they know how many people are driving by versus the cost of the buy. Want to frustrate, ask what the cost per thousand reaching those drivers? Is it effective and a good use the money, lets talk cost per thousand.
Posted by: Dave Jones at February 16, 2008 12:23 PM
I think it's hilarious that the photographer's name (see apology) is "Christman".
Posted by: Linda at February 16, 2008 1:04 PM
Obnoxious? Ugly, Elegant, Artistic, Cost per thousand? Here's the meat; Thought and dialogue was initiated. The mission was accomplished. The bottom Line is that the BB got people thinking about Jesus, and signs, and aesthetics, and consumerism and a host of other topics. Perhaps someone was moved a little closer in their faith journey. I think BB are ugly too but given they do exist we should use the worldly tools available to spread the Good News!
Posted by: Josh at February 19, 2008 5:33 AM
Everyone should check out all the comments and links from this page. The Pastor said it was no big deal, the editor said the guy that took the picture works with his youth group in the church and the yellow and black board is theme that has really seemed to hit the community. the church has a car that is yellow with JESUS real big on the side. Not my cup of tea, but the community seems to be taking notice. The newspaper has done numerous columns on that church.
Posted by: Scott Tuersley at March 3, 2008 8:46 PM
People need to get a life and not be such hyper-sensitive namby pamby Christians. This is the type of stuff that turns people off from Christianity.
Posted by: bruce at March 14, 2008 8:24 AM


