I think the reason Rolling Stone decided to accept the ad was because after all the hoopla and publicity (for Zondervan and Rolling Stone), in the end Rolling Stone at least wanted to make some money off the deal!

Here's a weird thought I had the other night; is it possible that the whole thing was cooked up, sub rosa, as a publicity stunt? Rolling Stone looks like it's kinda looking out for the interests of its "non religious" readership, Zondervan gets way more buzz than the ads themselves ever would have generated. And, in the end, Rolling Stone does the right thing. Nobody got all hot and bothered... Nobody said anything dangerously stupid... which is really unusual, and suspicious in and of itself.

I'm not a conspiracy theorist... but this is just too good to pass up. I'm not sure if I believe my own little theory or not. But I wanted to share this twisted notion with y'all.

That's hilarious, Andy! It would be one heck of a coup if someone could pull it off. Though it seems unlikely in today's day of blogs and such.

Now James Dobson and SpongeBob? Maybe. ;-)

I have to agree with Andy, Zondervan aren't your local church down the street, they are big money media owned by Rupert Murdoch, there would be a lot of PR stunt work going on there, if they think it will broaden their market outside their traditional Christian target market.

I do notice though that they also are running ads with MTV and other big media. It could be a case of "Let's push the limits and see what happens . . . "

It's amazing how something so simple can become so entangled. Zondervan publishes religious material. They simply wished to promote their product to the 'next' generation. Is it odd that they would choose Rolling Stone and MTV to market their products? I think not. And from Rolling Stone's viewpoint, they do not traditionally promote any sort of religious products. Could it be that the powers that be at Rolling Stone assumed their readership might feel alienated if they ran 'religious' add? Amazingly apparent.